The Delhi High Court has overturned a decision by the Controller of Patents to reject a patent application for decorative laminates. The court found that objections regarding clarity and succinctness were invalid, as the terms in question were adequately described in the specification and understandable to a person skilled in the art. The court also noted that the claims, although lengthy, were not unnecessarily so. Additionally, the court recommended revising the Manual of Patents to address clarity and succinctness objections.