Background of the Case

Humans of Bombay, much like its inspiration “Humans of New York,” weaves the tales of diverse individuals into interviews, articles, and multimedia creations. These are then shared across their website and various social media platforms. They alleged that POI, operating on a strikingly similar business model, replicated several of HOB’s stories, thereby infringing on copyrighted materials, including photographs, text, videos, and more.

POI’s Defense

In a hearing held on October 11, 2023, POI argued that the foundation of HOB’s platform was hardly original. Drawing attention to the multitude of platforms that sprouted from the “Humans of New York” idea, POI contended that such a concept couldn’t be copyrighted. They added that, since the images in their stories were sourced directly from the individuals featured, similarities with HOB’s content were inevitable. Interestingly, POI also highlighted instances where photos in HOB’s content matched those in their stories.

The Verdict

The Delhi High Court, in its wisdom, clarified that while HOB couldn’t claim exclusive rights over the storytelling platform idea, the unique way they presented and shared stories was, indeed, a protected expression under the Copyright Act of 1957. To replicate such an expression would be treading on the wrong side of the law.

Furthermore, the court underscored that personal images shared by users on these platforms weren’t under the purview of copyright claims by either platform. However, any commissioned photographs or films would remain protected by the entity that funded their creation.

In the end, to safeguard the rights and efforts of both platforms, the court prohibited either from using the copyrighted works of the other.

Conclusion

The “Humans of Bombay vs. People of India” verdict reinforces the principle that while ideas are free to roam, their distinctive expressions, once materialized, are safeguarded by the law. It’s a landmark decision that emphasizes the boundaries between inspiration and duplication, ensuring that creativity continues to thrive in the digital age.

The post “Humans of Bombay vs. People of India: A Landmark Copyright Verdict by Delhi High Court” appeared first on AVNTLTECH.

Design Novelty Dispute: T-Shape and Plug and Play

The plaintiffs, Philips Holding B.V., contended that the uniqueness of their electric bulbs lay in their distinctive T-Shape and Plug and Play format. They argued that the designs used by the defendants bore a striking resemblance to their own. To bolster their case, the plaintiffs presented a comparative report highlighting the undeniable similarities between the two sets of designs.

The Defendants’ Defense

In response, the defendants maintained that their designs were distinct and separate from those of the plaintiffs. They also asserted that the plaintiffs’ designs could potentially be invalidated due to the existence of prior, similar design registrations in India. The defendants further supported their case by presenting multiple design registrations for the same products.

Court’s Verdict: A Delicate Balancing Act

Upon careful examination of the arguments put forth by both parties, the court acknowledged the visual similarities between the designs. However, it ultimately concluded that the plaintiffs’ bulb designs were, in essence, trade-variants of pre-existing registered designs and, thus, ineligible for further registration.

Furthermore, the court rejected the plaintiffs’ plea of passing off, highlighting that the plaintiffs were not only the originators of these designs but also acted as the original equipment manufacturers for various lighting products for multiple companies. This association made it challenging to attribute the product exclusively to the plaintiffs.

This ruling in Philips Holding B.V. v. Jaiprakash Agarwal & Anr. sets a noteworthy precedent in design infringement cases, emphasizing the need for a delicate balance between protecting innovation and recognizing the limitations of design registration. As the legal landscape evolves, it is imperative for designers and manufacturers to navigate these complexities with care to safeguard their creative endeavours.

The post Delhi High Court’s Decision on Design Infringement: Philips vs. Jaiprakash Agarwal appeared first on AVNTLTECH.

What is Freedom to Operate (FTO)?

FTO refers to the ability to develop, make, use, and sell a product or process without infringing on the valid intellectual property rights of others, primarily patents. In simpler terms, it means ensuring that your innovation doesn’t step on someone else’s patented toes. Failure to conduct an FTO search can lead to costly legal battles, injunctions, and even the potential shutdown of your project or product.

Why are FTO Searches Essential?

Risk Mitigation: Perhaps the most apparent reason to conduct an FTO search is risk mitigation. By identifying existing patents that may overlap with your innovation, you can assess the level of risk involved and make informed decisions about whether to proceed, make modifications, or seek licensing agreements.

Cost Savings: Early detection of potential infringement issues allows you to address them proactively, often at a fraction of the cost compared to legal disputes. It’s an investment in avoiding costly litigation down the road.

Market Entry: FTO searches are vital for businesses looking to enter new markets or launch new products. Knowing the patent landscape in advance can help you plan your strategy, market positioning, and potential partnerships more effectively.

Innovation Protection: Just as FTO searches help you avoid infringing on others’ patents, they also help protect your own innovations. By identifying prior art and existing patents, you can refine your invention to ensure it’s novel and patentable.

How to Conduct an FTO Search

Define Your Scope: Start by clearly defining the scope of your search. Determine the geographic regions and markets relevant to your innovation.

Use Patents Databases: Utilize patent databases such as the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), the European Patent Office (EPO), or WIPO’s Patentscope to search for relevant patents.

Keyword Searches: Use specific keywords related to your innovation to search for relevant patents. Boolean operators can help refine your search.

Consult a Patent Professional: Conducting a thorough FTO search can be complex, and the results may require legal interpretation. Consulting with a patent attorney or professional can be invaluable in this process.

Conclusion

In the fast-paced world of innovation, securing the freedom to operate is not just a legal necessity; it’s a strategic advantage. FTO searches empower businesses and inventors to make informed decisions, mitigate risks, and protect their intellectual property. By proactively addressing patent infringement concerns, you can confidently navigate the path to innovation and market success.

Remember, an FTO search is not a one-time task; it should be an integral part of your innovation strategy, conducted at various stages of development to ensure your continued freedom to operate in a competitive and dynamic landscape. So, as you embark on your next groundbreaking venture, make FTO searches an essential part of your innovation toolkit and unlock the potential for limitless growth.

The post Unlocking Innovation: The Importance of Freedom to Operate (FTO) Searches appeared first on AVNTLTECH.

Preserving Creativity and Originality

One of the foremost reasons for design protection in the jewellery industry is to safeguard the creative efforts and originality of designers. Crafting a unique piece of jewellery involves imagination, artistic expression, and often countless hours of labor. Without protection, these designs can easily be replicated and sold by others, diluting the designer’s brand and income.

Design protection, particularly through design and copyrights, offers jewellery designers a legal shield against unauthorized copying. A design patent grants exclusive rights to the ornamental design of a functional item, like a piece of jewellery, for up to 15 years. Copyrights, on the other hand, protect original works of authorship, which can include jewellery designs and drawings.

Preserving Brand Integrity

For many jewellery designers, their name and brand are as valuable as their creations. Establishing a reputation for quality, uniqueness, and style takes years of hard work and dedication. Design protection helps maintain the integrity of a brand by ensuring that imitators cannot profit from copying a designer’s signature styles.

A strong brand identity built on unique designs can attract loyal customers who appreciate the originality and craftsmanship of a particular jewellery designer. If those designs were not protected, customers might be misled by inferior imitations, damaging the designer’s reputation and brand image.

Encouraging Innovation

Design protection not only benefits individual designers but also the jewellery industry as a whole. When designers know that their innovative creations are safeguarded, they are encouraged to push the boundaries of creativity. This leads to a constant influx of new ideas, materials, and techniques into the industry, which, in turn, benefits consumers with a wider array of choices.

Moreover, the jewellery industry thrives on healthy competition, and design protection fosters an environment where creators are motivated to innovate rather than simply replicate. This ultimately results in a marketplace enriched with diverse and compelling jewellery options.

Supporting Economic Growth

The jewellery industry is a significant contributor to the global economy. Jewellery designers, manufacturers, retailers, and artisans all rely on the industry for their livelihoods. By providing design protection, governments and legal systems promote economic growth by allowing designers to profit from their creations, thereby ensuring their continued contribution to the industry.

Furthermore, a thriving jewellery industry also stimulates tourism, as visitors seek out unique pieces from different regions of the world. This, in turn, boosts local economies and promotes cultural exchange.

Promoting Ethical Practices

Design protection also plays a crucial role in promoting ethical practices within the jewellery industry. Counterfeit jewellery, often produced in unregulated environments without concern for the ethical sourcing of materials, can flood the market if left unchecked. By protecting original designs, governments and organizations can help curb the influx of counterfeit goods and encourage responsible practices within the industry.

In conclusion, the importance of design protection for jewellery designers cannot be overstated. It preserves the creativity and originality of designers, maintains brand integrity, encourages innovation, supports economic growth, and promotes ethical practices within the industry. To ensure that the world continues to be adorned with unique and beautiful jewellery, it is essential that we recognize and protect the valuable work of jewellery designers everywhere.

The post Significance of Design Protection for Jewellery Designers appeared first on AVNTLTECH.

The post Test Post appeared first on AVNTLTECH.

The post Importance of Patentability Search appeared first on AVNTLTECH.

The post Delhi High Court Calls for Revision of Manual of Patent Office Practice and Procedure appeared first on AVNTLTECH.

The post Patent Office Practice and Procedure Revamp appeared first on AVNTLTECH.

The post Patent Office Practice and Procedure Revamp appeared first on AVNTLTECH.

The post Information about Indian Geographical Indications Law and Procedure appeared first on AVNTLTECH.